The mods and rockers were two conflicting British youth subcultures of
the early to mid-1960s. Media coverage of mods and rockers fighting
in 1964 sparked a moral panic about British youths, and the two
groups became labelled as folk devils.
The rocker subculture was centred on motorcycling, and their appearance
reflected that. Rockers generally wore protective clothing such as black
leather jackets and motorcycle boots (although they sometimes wore brothel
creeper shoes). The common rocker hairstyle was a pompadour,
which was associated with 1950s rock and roll —
the rockers' music genre of choice. The mod subculture was centred on fashion
and music, and many mods rode scooters. Mods wore suits and
other cleancut outfits, and preferred 1960s music genres such
as soul, rhythm and blues, ska and beat music.
The mods and rockers conflict led sociologist Stanley
Cohen to develop the term moral panic in his study Folk
Devils and Moral Panics, which examined media coverage of the mod and rocker
riots in the 1960s. Although Cohen admits that mods and rockers had some
fights in the mid-1960s, he argues that they were no different to the evening
brawls that occurred between youths throughout the 1950s and early 1960s, both
at seaside resorts and after football games. He claims that the UK media turned
the mod subculture into a negative symbol of delinquent and deviant status.
Most British Newspapers described the mod and rocker clashes as being of
"disastrous proportions", and labelled mods and rockers as
"sawdust Caesars", "vermin" and "louts".
Newspaper editorials fanned the flames of hysteria, such as a Birmingham
Post editorial in May 1964, which warned that mods and rockers were "internal
enemies" in the UK who would "bring about disintegration of a
nation's character". The magazine Police Review argued that the
mods and rockers' purported lack of respect for law and order could cause
violence to "surge and flame like a forest fire".
Fast forward a couple years another event similar to the mods and rockers
conflict just more destructive the London riots occurred.
Between 6th and 10th August 2011, the riots happened first in Tottenham and
later in Tottenham Hale Retail Park, thousands of people rioted in
several London boroughs and in cities and towns
across England. The chaos implicated generated looting, arson, and mass use of the
police. The events were also called "BlackBerry riots" because people
used social media and
their blackberry’s to broadcast when the events would happen and
The spread of news and rumours about the previous evening's disturbances in
Tottenham sparked riots during the night of 7 August in the London districts of
Brixton, Enfield, Islington and Wood Green and in Oxford Circus in
the centre of London. Disturbances began after a protest in Tottenham following
the death of Mark Duggan, a local who was shot dead
by police on 4 August 2011. Protesters became angry after police restrained a
sixteen-year-old girl who was alleged to have been acting in an aggressive and
disorderly manner. Several violent clashes with police, along with the
destruction of police cars, magistrates' court,
a double-decker bus, many civilian homes and
businesses, began gaining attention from the media. Overnight, looting took
place in ‘Tottenham Hale Retail Park’, nearby Wood Green
and hackney.
I feel that these two events are really similar because after these two
events occurred the teenagers of the generation were labelled as troublesome,
destructive, unmannered and thuggish. The British media enjoyed making these
events seem worse than they were especially the mods and rockers conflict.
Although the London riots were very destructive the precautions of this event
meant that the even teenagers as a whole got the blame, just like with the mods
and rockers conflict.
Umit Caglayan,16,The Petchey Academy. Keep up to date on my media studies work for the next year.
Showing posts with label Essay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Essay. Show all posts
Monday, 13 January 2014
Thursday, 3 October 2013
Essay
Men And Women In The Media
Most females in perfume advertisements are seen as sex
symbols and are often portrayed in to be less dominant that the male. This is
due to the idea that ‘sex sells’ and by having the females dressed in such a
manner that shows off most of their body
it activates the male gaze, although the perfume would is usually for a
female. The female body is also shown as slim with small thighs and no
cellulite any were and I believe that by portraying the women in the way in
this way makes the female audience want to buy because they might feel that buy
having this product they would be like the female in the advertisement. Men on
the other hand are seen to be the dominant and control the female. For example
in the ‘million’ perfume advert the male clicks his fingers and the females
dress falls off, this could symbolise that the man could have what he wants
just buy the clicking his fingers.
In music videos for artists such as 2 chains, Juicy J, Big Sean,
Rick Ross and many more always have the same type of females in their videos.
These said females are dressed in bikinis that show off allot more than is necessary,
these females also have a very similar body shape to other, were they have a
quite big bust tight waste and a massive backside. I feel that this adds to the
pressure for young girls to have this body figure in order to be seen as
attractive, although females are allot different to the ones in perfume adverts
for example they are dressed allot more trashy than the perfumes females. The
males in these videos are often shown as powerful and dominant. They often have
allotted of money that they throw about onto the females.
The advertisement I have chosen to study is the Nina L'Eau by Nina
Ricci. First we see this young lady looking into a mirror similar to the one in
Alice through the looking glass, the then steps into the other world that is
full of cherry blossom trees and looks like a dream, she begins to walk round
the maze and when she is at the end she sees a tree that amazes her, she pauses
and looks at the tree, then runs to reach the apple (perfume bottle) that was
hanging off the tree. I chose this advert because I feel that it is not like
other perfume ads in which the female is fully clothed in a flowy pastel pink
dress is quite child like. Unlike other adverts were the women are usually seen
as mature and grown up this one is cute and the female is seen as a young lady.
The camera follows her around the maze but never has her out of shot. She has
red lipstick that does add a level of maturity as the colour red is often seen
as provocative. The back of the dress is open yet she still looks classy.
Nina L'Eau by Nina Ricci
1 Million by Paco Robanne
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)